Skip to main content

  • HOME
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • SUBMIT
  • ABOUT
    • Journal
    • Editorial
  • INFO FOR
    • Librarians
    • Authors
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Members
    • Subscriptions and Single Issues
  • MORE
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us

  • Login

  • Advanced search

Institution: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Login
Advanced Search
  • HOME
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • SUBMIT
  • ABOUT
    • Journal
    • Editorial
  • INFO FOR
    • Librarians
    • Authors
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Members
    • Subscriptions and Single Issues
  • MORE
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
Journal of the American Musicological Society

  • Articles
The Council of Trent Revisited
Craig A. Monson
Journal of the American Musicological Society, Vol. 55 No. 1, Spring 2002; (pp. 1-37) DOI: 10.1525/jams.2002.55.1.1
Craig A. Monson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • View author's works on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

Reexamination of a wide range of documents surrounding the twenty-second, twenty-fourth, and twenty-fifth sessions of the Council of Trent reveals that delegates strived officially to say as little as possible about music: only that secular or impure elements should be eliminated and that specific issues should be settled locally, by individual bishops and provincial synods. But, beginning with Gustave Reese, several scholars have misleadingly strung together a preliminary canon, stressing textual intelligibility, which was never approved in the general congregations, and the few lines that actually supplanted it, concerned only with the elimination of lasciviousness. On the other hand, a largely unrecognized or misunderstood attack on church polyphony did occur at the less familiar twenty-fifth session, when Gabriele Paleotti may have attempted to suppress elaborate music in female monasteries. Although this attempt was rejected in the general congregations, its restrictions were subsequently revived by local authorities such as Paleotti and Carlo Borromeo in their own dioceses. In the Council's immediate aftermath, reformers such as Paleotti and Borromeo once again focused on the issue of intelligibility, affording it a quasi-official status that seems to have quickly become widely accepted as “iuxta formam concilii.”

  • © 2002 by the American Musicological Society. All rights reserved.

Log in using your username and password

Enter your Journal of the American Musicological Society username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol. 55 No. 1, Spring 2002

Journal of the American Musicological Society: 55 (1)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
eTOC Alert

RSSRSS Icon

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of the American Musicological Society.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Council of Trent Revisited
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of the American Musicological Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of the American Musicological Society web site.
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
The Council of Trent Revisited
Craig A. Monson
Journal of the American Musicological Society, Vol. 55 No. 1, Spring 2002; (pp. 1-37) DOI: 10.1525/jams.2002.55.1.1
Craig A. Monson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • View author's works on this site

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The Council of Trent Revisited
Craig A. Monson
Journal of the American Musicological Society, Vol. 55 No. 1, Spring 2002; (pp. 1-37) DOI: 10.1525/jams.2002.55.1.1
Craig A. Monson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • View author's works on this site
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
View Full Page PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Top
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Adémar de Chabannes (989–1034) and Musical Literacy
  • Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach, Portraits, and the Physiognomy of Music History
  • Haydn's Solar Poetics
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

FIND US Facebook Account LinkRSS Feeds LinkTwitter Account LinkLinkedin Account LinkYoutube Account LinkEmail Link

Customer Service

  • Subscribe
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Contact

UC Press

  • About UC Press

Navigate

  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • Editorial
  • Contact

Content

  • Current Issue
  • All Content

Info For

  • Librarians
  • Authors
  • Advertisers
  • Members
  • Subscriptions and Single Issues

Copyright © 2019 by the American Musicological Society   Privacy   Accessibility